Roman
posted by girl with trackies @ 11:57 AM
0 comments
links to this post
Wearing Trackies
I'm not miserable, but I still may as well be comfortable
I'm not miserable, but I still may as well be comfortable
I have been “young” enough to remember the time of this Polanski’s incident. From the photo published back then, this 13-year old girl was so well developed that she could easily pass for a 20-year old. Why would the director ask for her age. What about the drug party scene at Jack Nicholson villa? Why wasn’t Jack and his guests arrested for possession? Wasn’t it a ploy to divert police attenton, cry rape and testify against Roman Polanski as did Anjelica Houston to save her then boyfriend Jack from bigger embarassement. After Polanski’s wife died in a heinous way at the hands of psychopath Charles Manson while 8 months pregnant, perhaps it’s a tall order to expect Polanski to be of the highest moral character?
PS. The name is Polanski, not Polanksi. Shows how much opinionated bloggers really are familiar with the director and perpetuate this typo.
Wed 30 Sep 09 (09:32pm)
Wed 30 Sep 09 (10:02pm)
I hope you don’t live near amy high schools, you sick and perverted freak. F.O.A.D.
Wed 30 Sep 09 (10:38pm)
More defence of the indefensible by the left, whose moral compass swings more wildly than any chemically-enhanced shindig in Laurel Canyon.
Bottom line- if the Romester was some random pervert, unconnected to the self-aaponted elite who seem to believe their duty in life is to hector the humble about how to live while carrying on like a sackful of civet cats on crstal meth and viagra, you’d all be calling for his bollocks to be nailed to a table.
Because he’s from the sensitive and talented set, any behaviour is excusable, and indeed usually celebrated as a sign of genius.
Bang the old pervie up with some other priapetic deviants.
Wed 30 Sep 09 (10:40pm)
You’re a repellent human being. For God’s sake, don’t reproduce.
Wed 30 Sep 09 (10:45pm)
Here ya go, read all about it: the Grand Jury transcripts.
Got a link to those pictures of the child in question that you remember so clearly?
Thu 01 Oct 09 (12:10am)
“From the photo published back then, this 13-year old girl was so well developed that she could easily pass for a 20-year old.”
Seems unlikely that a photo was published, since her identity was kept secret until many years after the event.
“Why would the director ask for her age.”
Polanski testified under oath that he knew she was 13.
“Why wasn’t Jack and his guests arrested for possession?”
Nicholson was out of town at the time, his girlfriend was arrested for cocaine possession when the police searched Nicholson’s house. Polanski had quaalude in his possession when he was arrested at a hotel (which he supposedly tried to ditch).
“I have been “young” enough to remember the time of this Polanski’s incident.”
I think you may have Alzheimers.
Thu 01 Oct 09 (01:09am)
Grazia,
Quite apart from the appalling political incorrectness of absolving a monster’s guilt because the unfortunate 13 year old may not have “looked like” a 13 year old in published photos you may or may not remember accurately at the time, you then proceed to add irrelevant details to the argument. Who gives a bleep where Jack was, what his “guests” were doing or what Anjelica Huston (thanks Dave Carter below, otherwise I would have been soooo embarrassed) may have been saving her boyfriend from? That was just your ploy to divert attention from the facts at hand.
But you go on to suggest that because his wife was brutally murdered while 8 months pregnant, we should not expect high moral character from Polanski? What does the one have to do with the other? He either has the moral character to not drug, molest, rape and sodomise an unwilling child, or he has no moral character at all. Having suffered a terrible loss in such a violent manner should have no bearing on this issue, except to make it all the more appalling. It is neither mitigation nor excuse for poor moral character.
And your PS says it all. I know this man, I’ve seen his movies, he’s an awesomedirector, his movies made me cry, and if you opinionated bloggers really understood his art you would understand that he was really the victim in all this and that b**** girl with her overdeveloped breasts and overbearing mother deserved everything she got!!
You are more worried about the spelling of the paedophile’s name than the fact that what he did eviscerates the idea that little girls are UNTOUCHABLE by ANYONE, ANYTIME, ANYWHERE. THERE IS NO EXCUSE, NO REASON, NO JUSTIFICATION, NO ARGUMENT, NO ART, NO FAME, NO STATUS AND NO STATUTE OF LIMITATION.
I’ll say it again - nice and loud in case you may have missed it the first time. ALL LITTLE GIRLS ARE UNTOUCHABLE!! EVEN IF YOUR NAME IS ROMAN POLANKSI!
Thu 01 Oct 09 (02:40am)
“From the photo published back then, this 13-year old girl was so well developed that she could easily pass for a 20-year old.”
OK, right, I see your point; if it’s got big tits then I guess it’s OK to rape it.
PS: “Why would the director ask for her age” should end with a question-mark, if we’re going to descend to that level.
Thu 01 Oct 09 (02:55am)
“After Polanski’s wife died in a heinous way at the hands of psychopath Charles Manson while 8 months pregnant, perhaps it’s a tall order to expect Polanski to be of the highest moral character?”
Seriously? His wife gets butchered, and that gives him a license to rape kids? I don’t buy that for a minute.